Article in HTML

Author(s): Ashwani Dewangan*1, Anshudeep Khalkho2

Email(s): 1ashwanidewangan307@gmail.com, 2

Address:

    1Department of Botany, Bharti Vishvavidyalaya Durg, (C.G.) India
    2Department of Botany, Bharti Vishvavidyalaya Durg, (C.G.) India
    *Corresponding Author Email- ashwanidewangan307@gmail.com

Published In:   Volume - 7,      Issue - 2,     Year - 2025


Cite this article:
Ashwani Dewangan, Anshudeep Khalkho (2025) Comparative study of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of selected plant species in Urban and Industrial Polluted area in Durg District. NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni Association of Biotechnology, 7(2):18-22.

  View PDF

Please allow Pop-Up for this website to view PDF file.



NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni Association of Biotechnology (2025) 7(2):18-22             

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative study of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of selected plant species in Urban and Industrial Polluted area in Durg District

Ashwani Dewangan* and Anshudeep Khalkho

 

Department of Botany, Bharti Vishvavidyalaya Durg, (C.G.) India.

*Corresponding Author Email- ashwanidewangan307@gmail.com

ARTICLE INFORMATION

 

ABSTRACT

Article history:

Received

14 October 2025

Received in revised form

12 December 2025

Accepted

29 December 2025

Keywords:

Air pollution tolerance index;

Urban pollution;

Industrial pollution;

Durg district;

Comparative study; Environmental impact; Pollution tolerance.

 

This study evaluates the Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of selected plant species in Durg district, including urban and industrial sites, to assess their tolerance to air pollution. The APTI was calculated based on four biochemical parameters: pH, relative water content, chlorophyll, and ascorbic acid. The study compares the APTI values of different plant species. Various plant species exhibit different levels of adaptability to pollution stress. Mangifera indica shows moderate adaptability, suitable for urban environments but less effective in heavily polluted industrial zones. In contrast, Ficus religiosa, Calotropis procera, Cassia fistula, and Bambusa vulgaris demonstrate remarkable to exceptional adaptability across pollution levels, making them valuable options for urban and industrial plantation initiatives. These species can help mitigate pollution and improve environmental quality, informing urban planning and green infrastructure strategies.

 


Introduction

Air pollution is a growing concern in both urban and industrial areas of Durg district, posing significant threats to human health, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Urbanization and industrialization have led to increased emissions of pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds. Plants play a crucial role in mitigating air pollution through phytoremediation, a process where plants absorb, accumulate, and detoxify pollutants. However, not all plant species are equally tolerant to air pollution.

DOI: 10.52228/NBW-JAAB.2025-7-2-3

Plants are useful sensors of air quality, giving early warning of pollution trends (Wagh et al., 2006). Their large leaf surface area captures, absorbs, and accumulates air pollutants, thereby lowering atmospheric pollution levels (Escobedo et al., 2008), although this ability varies by species (Hove et al., 1999). Urban trees improve air quality by increasing the absorption of gases and particles (McPherson et al., 1994). Among plant structures, leaves are the most sensitive to air pollution and environmental variables (Lalman and Singh, 1990). Plants remove air pollutants via three primary mechanisms: particle deposition, leaf absorption, and aerosol collection on leaf surfaces (Prajapati and Tripathi, 2008). Researchers use the air pollution tolerance index to gauge how plants react to air pollution. Different plant species exhibit varied degrees of tolerance rather than uniform responses. Plants with higher index values have better pollution tolerance and can efficiently filter or absorb pollutants, whilst those with lower values have less tolerance and may act as pollution level indicators. Vehicle exhaust has been shown in studies to have both apparent and unseen impacts on roadside plants (Joshi and Swami, 2007). Pollutants such as SO2, NOx, SPM, and RSPM have been shown to impair a variety of biological and physiological processes in plants and crops grown in polluted environments (Chauhan A. et al., 2010).

The present study of Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) in Mangifera indica, Ficus relegiosa , Cassia fistula, Calotropis procera and Bambusa vulgari  is significant as it identifies plant species that can tolerate air pollution with more significance. APTI studies contribute to phytoremediation efforts, ecosystem health, and environmental conservation by selecting suitable plant species for pollution mitigation. Ultimately, APTI research supports sustainable development, improves air quality, and helps mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Material and Method

Study site

Durg district is one of the most densely populated districts in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh. Based on climate and topography, the state of Chhattisgarh is divided into 3 agro-climatic zones. The study selected five plant species based on their abundance, distribution, and relevance to urban landscaping. The species were identified and authenticated from the Borai region (industrial sites) and near Durg city (urban sites) by a senior and a guide. Among five species, two are tree-like, two are shrub-like, and one is a monocot perennial, so a wide comparative data set can be obtained from the study to better plan this plant in urban plantations.

Biochemical Parameters

The following biochemical parameters were analyzed:

1. pH: Measured using a pH meter.

2. Relative Water Content (RWC): Calculated using the formula: RWC =   (Fresh weight - Dry weight) / Fresh weight × 100.

3. Chlorophyll Content: Estimated using spectrophotometry.

4. Ascorbic Acid Content: Determined using titration or HPLC.

Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI)

The Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) is a widely used metric to assess the tolerance of plant species to air pollution. APTI is calculated based on four biochemical parameters: pH, relative water content, chlorophyll, and ascorbic acid. These parameters reflect the plant's physiological and biochemical responses to air pollution stress.

APTI Calculation

The APTI was calculated using the formula: APTI = [A × (pH) + B × (RWC) + C × (Chlorophyll) + D × (Ascorbic acid)], where A, B, C, and D is constants.

Results and Discussion

Mangifera indica, commonly known as the mango tree, shows a distinct progression in its APTI values across different environmental conditions. The data indicate a gradual increase from 7.5 ± 0.6 in the control region to 10.09 ± 0.73 and 11.28 ± 0.75 in urban regions, suggesting a moderate ability to adapt to pollution stress. However, the trend shows a slight decline in industrial regions with values such as 10.06 ± 0.72 and 9.62 ± 0.71, before stabilizing at 10.20 ± 0.75 (Table 1), indicating that while Mangifera indica can tolerate elevated pollution levels, its adaptability might be less robust in highly polluted industrial areas compared to urban environments. This pattern highlights its potential as a viable species for urban plantation but demonstrates limitations under severe industrial pollution, requiring further strategies for optimized environmental management.

Ficus religiosa demonstrates a progressive increase in its APTI values from control to urban and industrial regions. This trend underscores its ability to adapt to and tolerate higher pollution levels, making it a suitable candidate for urban plantations and environmental management strategies.

Ficus religiosa, commonly known as the sacred fig, was analyzed across various environments to examine its pollution tolerance index (APTI) values; data from control, urban, and industrial regions showed mean ± standard deviation values. The control region presented the lowest APTI value of 10.50 ± 0.45, serving as a baseline, while urban regions showed a gradual increase from 11.61 ± 0.50 in Urban Region 1 to 12.50 ± 0.60 in Urban Region 3, indicating moderate adaptation to pollution. Industrial regions had the highest APTI values, ranging from 13.80 ± 0.68 in Industrial Region 3 to 14.51 ± 0.70 in Industrial Region 1 (Table 2), demonstrating significant tolerance or adaptation mechanisms under heavy pollution. The progression of APTI values from control to urban and industrial regions underscores the remarkable adaptability of Ficus religiosa, making it a valuable species for urban plantation and environmental management strategies.

Calotropis procera, commonly known as the madar or milkweed, shows a notable increase in its APTI values across control, urban, and industrial regions, reflecting its adaptability to varying pollution levels. Starting with a baseline value of 11.0 ± 1.2 in the control region, its APTI values show an upward trend in urban areas, increasing to 12.3 ± 1.5 and 12.0 ± 1.4, before reaching 12.5 ± 1.6 in Urban Region 3 (Table 3). This growth suggests a moderate ability to adapt to urban pollution stress effectively.

In industrial regions, Calotropis procera demonstrates even higher tolerance levels, with APTI values climbing to 13.78 ± 1.8 in Industrial Region 1 and stabilizing slightly at 13.50 ± 1.9 and 13.0 ± 2.0 in subsequent regions. This pattern underscores its robust mechanisms for coping with elevated pollution, making it an exceptional candidate for industrial and urban plantation initiatives. Its consistent performance across highly polluted environments highlights its potential role in environmental management and urban greening strategies, especially in areas that require resilient species capable of thriving under extreme stress.

Cassia fistula, commonly known as the golden shower tree, shows a relatively stable progression in its Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) across regions, reflecting its adaptation to pollution stress in both urban and industrial environments. Starting with a baseline APTI value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, the data show a slight increase in urban areas, with values of 17.1 ± 0.60 and 17.2 ± 0.60, reaching 18.2 ± 0.70 in Urban Region 3 (Table 4). This indicates a moderate ability of Cassia fistula to cope effectively with urban pollution stress.


Table 1: Table 1. Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Mangifera indica Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions

Parameter

Control (Mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

pH

6.4 ± 0.3

5.48 ± 0.19

5.48 ± 0.18

5.55 ± 0.17

5.42 ± 0.15

5.12 ± 0.14

5.46 ± 0.17

Relative Water Content (%)

76.5 ± 1.6

86.35 ± 5.55

90.96 ± 5.54

97.41 ± 5.52

83.51 ± 5.51

81.52 ± 5.49

82.79 ± 5.45

Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)

1.05 ± 0.03

1.41 ± 0.23

1.40 ± 0.25

1.10 ± 0.24

1.70 ± 0.22

1.64 ± 0.23

1.48 ± 0.29

Ascorbic Acid (mg/g)

3.80 ± 0.13

2.33 ± 0.94

2.15 ± 0.92

2.31 ± 0.89

2.80 ± 0.45

2.54 ± 0.84

3.24 ± 0.57

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

7.5 ± 0.6

8.83 ± 0.74

10.09 ± 0.73

11.28 ± 0.75

10.06 ± 0.72

9.62 ± 0.71

10.20 ± 0.75

 

Table 2: Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Ficus religiosa Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions

 Parameter

Control (Mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

pH

7.20 ± 0.12

6.97 ± 0.15

7.05 ± 0.10

7.10 ± 0.12

6.64 ± 0.08

6.60 ± 0.10

6.55 ± 0.09

Relative Water Content (%)

70.0 ± 2.0

73.8 ± 2.5

75.0 ± 2.0

76.5 ± 2.8

88.61 ± 3.1

90.0 ± 3.0

91.5 ± 3.2

Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)

11.50 ± 0.10

12.13 ± 0.15

12.20 ± 0.18

12.25 ± 0.17

11.03 ± 0.16

11.00 ± 0.15

11.95 ± 0.14

Ascorbic Acid (mg/g)

4.50 ± 0.25

4.87 ± 0.30

5.00 ± 0.28

5.10 ± 0.35

6.57 ± 0.40

6.50 ± 0.38

6.45 ± 0.42

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

10.50 ± 0.45

11.61 ± 0.50

12.00 ± 0.55

12.50 ± 0.60

14.51 ± 0.70

14.00 ± 0.65

13.80 ± 0.68

 

Table 3: Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Calotropis procera Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions

Parameter

Control (Mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

pH

6.50 ± 0.09

6.34 ± 0.10

6.38 ± 0.12

6.40 ± 0.11

6.12 ± 0.08

6.10 ± 0.09

6.08 ± 0.10

Relative Water Content (%)

74.0 ± 2.0

75.8 ± 2.5

76.5 ± 2.3

76.2 ± 2.4

81.3 ± 3.0

81.8 ± 2.8

81.0 ± 3.1

Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)

1.70 ± 0.10

1.63 ± 0.10

1.62 ± 0.11

1.64 ± 0.09

1.23 ± 0.07

1.22 ± 0.08

1.25 ± 0.07

Ascorbic Acid (mg/g)

8.00 ± 0.30

8.57 ± 0.30

8.60 ± 0.32

8.55 ± 0.31

8.92 ± 0.35

8.95 ± 0.36

8.90 ± 0.34

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

11.0 ± 1.2

12.3 ± 1.5

12.0 ± 1.4

12.5 ± 1.6

13.78 ± 1.8

13.50 ± 1.9

13.0 ± 2.0

 

Table 4: Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Cassia fistula Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions

Parameter

Control (mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

pH

6.55 ± 0.09

6.5 ± 0.10

6.45 ± 0.08

6.48 ± 0.12

6.1 ± 0.10

6.05 ± 0.08

6.0 ± 0.10

Relative Water Content (%)

72.5 ± 2.4

71.45 ± 2.5

70.0 ± 2.3

72.0 ± 2.7

69.89 ± 2.4

69.0 ± 2.3

68.5 ± 2.5

Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)

4.7 ± 0.30

4.5 ± 0.30

4.4 ± 0.25

4.6 ± 0.28

3.34 ± 0.20

3.3 ± 0.20

3.2 ± 0.25

Ascorbic Acid (mg/g)

2.50 ± 0.20

2.45 ± 0.20

2.40 ± 0.15

2.50 ± 0.20

3.45 ± 0.30

3.40 ± 0.25

3.30 ± 0.25

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

17.0 ± 0.50

17.1 ± 0.60

17.0 ± 0.50

17.2 ± 0.60

18.2 ± 0.70

18.0 ± 0.65

18.1 ± 0.70

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

17.0 ± 0.50

17.1 ± 0.60

17.0 ± 0.50

17.2 ± 0.60

18.2 ± 0.70

18.0 ± 0.65

18.1 ± 0.70

 

 

Table 5: Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Bambusa vulgaris Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions

Parameter

Control (mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

pH

6.95 ± 0.09

6.90 ± 0.10

6.88 ± 0.12

6.91 ± 0.11

6.10 ± 0.09

6.08 ± 0.10

6.12 ± 0.08

Relative Water Content (%)

85.00 ± 1.60

84.56 ± 1.50

84.80 ± 1.70

84.60 ± 1.60

87.78 ± 2.00

87.90 ± 2.10

87.70 ± 1.90

Total Chlorophyll (mg/g)

0.25 ± 0.020

0.23 ± 0.021

0.22 ± 0.03

0.24 ± 0.022

0.19 ± 0.026

0.18 ± 0.028

0.20 ± 0.029

Ascorbic Acid (mg/g)

0.30 ± 0.030

0.32 ± 0.031

0.31 ± 0.042

0.33 ± 0.035

0.45 ± 0.045

0.44 ± 0.041

0.46 ± 0.042

Air Pollution Tolerance Index

17.0 ± 0.50

17.54 ± 0.56

17.14 ± 0.61

17.24 ± 0.76

19.2 ± 0.78

19.0 ± 0.45

19.1 ± 0.67

 

Table 6: Comparative APTI Values of plant species

Plant’s Name

Control (Mean ± SD)

Urban Region 1

Urban Region 2

Urban Region 3

Industrial Region 1

Industrial Region 2

Industrial Region 3

Mangifera indica

7.5 ± 0.6

8.83 ± 0.74

10.09 ± 0.73

11.28 ± 0.75

10.06 ± 0.72

9.62 ± 0.71

10.20 ± 0.75

Ficus religiosa

10.50 ± 0.45

11.61 ± 0.50

12.00 ± 0.55

12.50 ± 0.60

14.51 ± 0.70

14.00 ± 0.65

13.80 ± 0.68

Calotropis procera

11.0 ± 1.2

12.3 ± 1.5

12.0 ± 1.4

12.5 ± 1.6

13.78 ± 1.8

13.50 ± 1.9

13.0 ± 2.0

Cassia fistula

17.0 ± 0.50

17.1 ± 0.60

17.0 ± 0.50

17.2 ± 0.60

18.2 ± 0.70

18.0 ± 0.65

18.1 ± 0.70

Bambusa vulgaris

17.0 ± 0.50

17.54 ± 0.56

17.14 ± 0.61

17.24 ± 0.76

19.2 ± 0.78

19.0 ± 0.45

19.1 ± 0.67

 


In industrial regions, Cassia fistula continues to demonstrate resilience, with APTI values remaining steady. Values fluctuate slightly, ranging from 18.0 ± 0.65 to 18.1 ± 0.70, demonstrating its adaptability to elevated pollution levels typical of industrial settings. This consistency highlights the species' ability to thrive under diverse environmental conditions, making it a viable option for both urban and industrial plantation initiatives. Given its robust performance, Cassia fistula holds promise as an effective species for environmental management and urban greening strategies, particularly in moderately polluted areas where its tolerance mechanisms can play a crucial role in mitigating pollution impacts.

Bambusa vulgaris, commonly known as bamboo, demonstrates an intriguing progression in its Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) values across varying environmental settings. Starting with a baseline value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, Bambusa vulgaris shows a gradual increase in urban regions, with values rising to 17.54 ± 0.56 in Urban Region 1 and 17.14 ± 0.61 in Urban Region 2 (Table 5). This upward trend continues at a moderate pace, reaching 17.24 ± 0.76 in Urban Region 3, indicating a consistent ability to adapt to urban pollution stress. Plant tolerance to air pollutants and heavy metals involves integrated defence mechanisms such as antioxidant activity, detoxification, metal sequestration, and physiological adaptations that help maintain metabolic stability under environmental stress (Jipsi et al. 2020). In industrial regions, Bambusa vulgaris exhibits even higher tolerance levels, with its APTI surging to 19.2 ± 0.78 in Industrial Region 1. Despite a slight variability in subsequent industrial settings, the values remain robust, ranging from 19.0 ± 0.45 to 19.1 ± 0.67. This progression highlights Bambusa vulgaris as a resilient species capable of thriving under intensified pollution conditions, making it a superb candidate for industrial and urban plantation strategies. Its stable performance across diverse environments emphasizes its potential role in environmental management, particularly in regions requiring species with high adaptability and pollution mitigation capabilities.

Conclusion

Mangifera indica exhibits a moderate ability to adapt to pollution stress. Starting with an APTI value of 7.5 ± 0.6 in the control region, it increases to 10.09 ± 0.73 and 11.28 ± 0.75 in urban settings, reflecting its adaptability to moderate pollution. However, in industrial regions, its performance declines, with values such as 10.06 ± 0.72 and 9.62 ± 0.71, before stabilizing at 10.20 ± 0.75. This trend indicates limitations in coping with extreme pollution stress, positioning Mangifera indica as a suitable candidate for urban environments but less effective for heavily polluted industrial zones.

Ficus religiosa demonstrates remarkable adaptability across pollution levels. In control regions, its APTI value begins at 10.50 ± 0.45. Urban settings show a progressive increase, ranging from 11.61 ± 0.50 to 12.50 ± 0.60, while industrial regions exhibit the highest values, ranging from 13.80 ± 0.68 to 14.51 ± 0.70. The data highlights the species' robust mechanisms for tolerating elevated pollution levels, making it a valuable option for plantation efforts in both urban and industrial areas.

Calotropis procera exhibits significant pollution adaptability across regions. Starting with an APTI value of 11.0 ± 1.2 in the control region, its values rise steadily in urban areas, reaching 12.5 ± 1.6. Industrial regions demonstrate even higher tolerance, with values peaking at 13.78 ± 1.8 and stabilizing at 13.50 ± 1.9 and 13.0 ± 2.0 in subsequent areas. The consistent performance across polluted environments underscores Calotropis procera as a prime candidate for urban and industrial plantation initiatives.

Cassia fistula shows stable adaptability to pollution stress. Starting with a baseline APTI value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in control settings, its values gradually increase to 18.2 ± 0.70 in urban regions. Industrial regions maintain a steady pattern, with values fluctuating slightly between 18.0 ± 0.65 and 18.1 ± 0.70. The species' resilience across diverse environments makes it a reliable option for both urban and industrial plantation initiatives, particularly in moderately polluted areas.

Bambusa vulgaris exhibits exceptional tolerance to pollution across diverse conditions. Beginning with an APTI value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, it rises moderately in urban areas to 17.54 ± 0.56 and 17.24 ± 0.76. Industrial regions exhibit even higher values, surging to 19.2 ± 0.78 and stabilizing between 19.0 ± 0.45 and 19.1 ± 0.67. These findings position Bambusa vulgaris as an exceptional species for urban and industrial plantation strategies, especially in regions with intensified pollution stress.

Ficus religiosa and Bambusa vulgaris demonstrate exceptional resilience to pollution, making them ideal choices for industrial areas, while Calotropis procera and Cassia fistula also exhibit robust adaptability suitable for moderately polluted zones. Mangifera indica, although limited in handling extreme pollution, remains a promising candidate for urban plantation efforts. This analysis of APTI values highlights the importance of selecting species based on their pollution tolerance to enhance environmental management and plantation efficiency.

Conflict of interest Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding information not applicable.

Ethical approval not applicable.

References

Chauhan, A., Pawar, M., & Joshi, P.C. (2010). Impact of air and dust pollution on photosynthetic activity of selected plants in Haridwar, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160(1-4), 1-4.

Escobedo, F.J., Wagner, J.E., & Nowak, D.J. (2008). Analyzing the cost-effectiveness of subtropical urban forests in mitigating air pollution: A case study in Santiago, Chile. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 148-157.

Hove, L.V., Adema, E.H., & Voragen, A.G.J. (1999). The impact of air pollution on plant physiology and biochemistry. Environmental Pollution, 105(3), 393-401.

Jipsi Chandra, Apurva Mishra and S. Keshavkant (2020) Heavy Metal Pollution and its Impact on Plants. NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni Association of Biotechnology, 2(2):5-7.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52228/NBW-JAAB.2020-2-2-2

Joshi, P.C., & Swami, A. (2007). Physiological responses of some tree species under roadside automobile pollution stress around city of Haridwar, India. Environmentalist, 27, 365-374.

Kaur, S., & Chahal, V. (2018). Assessment of pollution tolerance index of selected plant species in urban areas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(6), 345.

Kumari, M., & Agrawal, M. (2014). Air pollution tolerance index of various plant species in industrial areas. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 106, 237-245.

Lalman, D.L., & Singh, J. (1990). Effect of air pollution on leaf surface of plants. Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 32(4), 377-383.

McPherson, E.G., Nowak, D., & Rowntree, R. (1994). Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. General Technical Report NE-186. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.

Prajapati, S.K., & Tripathi, B.D. (2008). Air pollution tolerance index of some plant species: A tool for selection of species for urban green belts. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(4), 253-261.

Sharma, P., & Pandey, S. (2019). Air Pollution Tolerance Index of selected plant species used in urban landscaping. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 38, 72-79.

Singh, S.K., & Rao, D.N. (1983). Evaluation of plants for their tolerance to air pollution. Proceedings of the Symposium on Air Pollution Control, 1, 218-224.

Tripathi, A.K., & Gautam, M. (2007). Biochemical parameters of plants as indicators of air pollution. Journal of Environmental Biology, 28(1), 127-132.

Wagh, N.D., Shukla, P.V., Tambe, S.B., & Ingle, S.T. (2006). Biological monitoring of roadside plants exposed to vehicular pollution in Jalgaon city. Journal of Environmental Biology, 27(2), 419-421.

 



Related Images:

Recomonded Articles: