NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni Association of Biotechnology (2025) 7(2):18-22
RESEARCH
ARTICLE
Comparative study of Air Pollution Tolerance Index of
selected plant species in Urban and Industrial Polluted area in Durg District
Ashwani Dewangan* and Anshudeep Khalkho
Department of Botany, Bharti Vishvavidyalaya Durg,
(C.G.) India.
*Corresponding Author Email- ashwanidewangan307@gmail.com
|
ARTICLE INFORMATION
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
|
Article history:
Received
14 October 2025
Received in revised form
12 December 2025
Accepted
Keywords:
Air
pollution tolerance index;
Urban
pollution;
Industrial
pollution;
Durg
district;
Comparative
study; Environmental impact; Pollution tolerance.
|
|
This study
evaluates the Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of selected plant species
in Durg district, including urban and industrial sites, to assess their
tolerance to air pollution. The APTI was calculated based on four biochemical
parameters: pH, relative water content, chlorophyll, and ascorbic acid. The
study compares the APTI values of different plant species. Various plant
species exhibit different levels of adaptability to pollution stress. Mangifera
indica shows moderate adaptability, suitable for urban environments but
less effective in heavily polluted industrial zones. In contrast, Ficus
religiosa, Calotropis procera, Cassia fistula, and Bambusa
vulgaris demonstrate remarkable to exceptional adaptability across
pollution levels, making them valuable options for urban and industrial
plantation initiatives. These species can help mitigate pollution and improve
environmental quality, informing urban planning and green infrastructure
strategies.
|
|
|
Introduction
Air pollution is a growing concern in both urban and
industrial areas of Durg district, posing significant threats to human health,
ecosystems, and biodiversity. Urbanization and industrialization have led to
increased emissions of pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen
oxides, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds. Plants play a crucial
role in mitigating air pollution through phytoremediation, a process where
plants absorb, accumulate, and detoxify pollutants. However, not all plant
species are equally tolerant to air pollution.
DOI: 10.52228/NBW-JAAB.2025-7-2-3
|
Plants are useful sensors of air
quality, giving early warning of pollution trends (Wagh et al., 2006). Their
large leaf surface area captures, absorbs, and accumulates air pollutants,
thereby lowering atmospheric pollution levels (Escobedo et al., 2008), although
this ability varies by species (Hove et al., 1999). Urban trees improve air
quality by increasing the absorption of gases and particles (McPherson et al.,
1994). Among plant structures, leaves are the most sensitive to air pollution
and environmental variables (Lalman and Singh, 1990). Plants remove air
pollutants via three primary mechanisms: particle deposition, leaf absorption,
and aerosol collection on leaf surfaces (Prajapati and Tripathi, 2008).
Researchers use the air pollution tolerance index to gauge how plants react to
air pollution. Different plant species exhibit varied degrees of tolerance
rather than uniform responses. Plants with higher index values have better
pollution tolerance and can efficiently filter or absorb pollutants, whilst
those with lower values have less tolerance and may act as pollution level
indicators. Vehicle exhaust has been shown in studies to have both apparent and
unseen impacts on roadside plants (Joshi and Swami, 2007). Pollutants such as
SO2, NOx, SPM, and RSPM have been shown to impair a
variety of biological and physiological processes in plants and crops grown in
polluted environments (Chauhan A. et al., 2010).
The
present study of Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) in Mangifera indica,
Ficus relegiosa , Cassia fistula, Calotropis procera and Bambusa vulgari
is significant as it identifies
plant species that can tolerate air pollution with more significance. APTI
studies contribute to phytoremediation efforts, ecosystem health, and
environmental conservation by selecting suitable plant species for pollution
mitigation. Ultimately, APTI research supports sustainable development,
improves air quality, and helps mitigate the impacts of climate change.
Material and Method
Study site
Durg
district is one of the most densely populated districts in the Indian state of
Chhattisgarh. Based on climate and topography, the state of Chhattisgarh is
divided into 3 agro-climatic zones. The study selected five
plant species based on their abundance, distribution, and relevance to urban
landscaping. The species were identified and authenticated from the Borai
region (industrial sites) and near Durg city (urban sites) by a senior and a
guide. Among five species, two are tree-like, two are shrub-like, and one is a
monocot perennial, so a wide comparative data set can be obtained from the
study to better plan this plant in urban plantations.
Biochemical Parameters
The following biochemical parameters were analyzed:
1. pH:
Measured using a pH meter.
2. Relative
Water Content (RWC): Calculated using the formula: RWC = (Fresh weight - Dry weight) / Fresh weight ×
100.
3. Chlorophyll
Content: Estimated using spectrophotometry.
4. Ascorbic
Acid Content: Determined using titration or HPLC.
Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI)
The Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) is a widely
used metric to assess the tolerance of plant species to air pollution. APTI is
calculated based on four biochemical parameters: pH, relative water content,
chlorophyll, and ascorbic acid. These parameters reflect the plant's
physiological and biochemical responses to air pollution stress.
APTI Calculation
The APTI was calculated using the formula: APTI = [A
× (pH) + B × (RWC) + C × (Chlorophyll) + D × (Ascorbic acid)], where A, B, C,
and D is constants.
Results and Discussion
Mangifera
indica, commonly
known as the mango tree, shows a distinct progression in its APTI values across
different environmental conditions. The data indicate a gradual increase from
7.5 ± 0.6 in the control region to 10.09 ± 0.73 and 11.28 ± 0.75 in urban
regions, suggesting a moderate ability to adapt to pollution stress. However,
the trend shows a slight decline in industrial regions with values such as
10.06 ± 0.72 and 9.62 ± 0.71, before stabilizing at 10.20 ± 0.75 (Table 1),
indicating that while Mangifera indica can tolerate elevated pollution
levels, its adaptability might be less robust in highly polluted industrial
areas compared to urban environments. This pattern highlights its potential as
a viable species for urban plantation but demonstrates limitations under severe
industrial pollution, requiring further strategies for optimized environmental
management.
Ficus
religiosa demonstrates
a progressive increase in its APTI values from control to urban and industrial
regions. This trend underscores its ability to adapt to and tolerate higher
pollution levels, making it a suitable candidate for urban plantations and
environmental management strategies.
Ficus
religiosa, commonly
known as the sacred fig, was analyzed across various environments to examine
its pollution tolerance index (APTI) values; data from control, urban, and
industrial regions showed mean ± standard deviation values. The control region
presented the lowest APTI value of 10.50 ± 0.45, serving as a baseline, while
urban regions showed a gradual increase from 11.61 ± 0.50 in Urban Region 1 to
12.50 ± 0.60 in Urban Region 3, indicating moderate adaptation to pollution.
Industrial regions had the highest APTI values, ranging from 13.80 ± 0.68 in
Industrial Region 3 to 14.51 ± 0.70 in Industrial Region 1 (Table 2),
demonstrating significant tolerance or adaptation mechanisms under heavy
pollution. The progression of APTI values from control to urban and industrial
regions underscores the remarkable adaptability of Ficus religiosa, making it a
valuable species for urban plantation and environmental management strategies.
Calotropis
procera, commonly
known as the madar or milkweed, shows a notable increase in its APTI values
across control, urban, and industrial regions, reflecting its adaptability to
varying pollution levels. Starting with a baseline value of 11.0 ± 1.2 in the
control region, its APTI values show an upward trend in urban areas, increasing
to 12.3 ± 1.5 and 12.0 ± 1.4, before reaching 12.5 ± 1.6 in Urban Region 3
(Table 3). This growth suggests a moderate ability to adapt to urban pollution
stress effectively.
In
industrial regions, Calotropis procera demonstrates even higher tolerance
levels, with APTI values climbing to 13.78 ± 1.8 in Industrial Region 1 and
stabilizing slightly at 13.50 ± 1.9 and 13.0 ± 2.0 in subsequent regions. This
pattern underscores its robust mechanisms for coping with elevated pollution,
making it an exceptional candidate for industrial and urban plantation
initiatives. Its consistent performance across highly polluted environments
highlights its potential role in environmental management and urban greening
strategies, especially in areas that require resilient species capable of
thriving under extreme stress.
Cassia
fistula, commonly
known as the golden shower tree, shows a relatively stable progression in its
Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) across regions, reflecting its adaptation
to pollution stress in both urban and industrial environments. Starting with a
baseline APTI value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, the data show a
slight increase in urban areas, with values of 17.1 ± 0.60 and 17.2 ± 0.60,
reaching 18.2 ± 0.70 in Urban Region 3 (Table 4). This indicates a moderate
ability of Cassia fistula to cope effectively with urban pollution
stress.
Table 1: Table 1. Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Mangifera indica
Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions
|
Parameter
|
Control
(Mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
pH
|
6.4
± 0.3
|
5.48
± 0.19
|
5.48
± 0.18
|
5.55
± 0.17
|
5.42
± 0.15
|
5.12
± 0.14
|
5.46
± 0.17
|
|
Relative
Water Content (%)
|
76.5
± 1.6
|
86.35
± 5.55
|
90.96
± 5.54
|
97.41
± 5.52
|
83.51
± 5.51
|
81.52
± 5.49
|
82.79
± 5.45
|
|
Total
Chlorophyll (mg/g)
|
1.05
± 0.03
|
1.41
± 0.23
|
1.40
± 0.25
|
1.10
± 0.24
|
1.70
± 0.22
|
1.64
± 0.23
|
1.48
± 0.29
|
|
Ascorbic
Acid (mg/g)
|
3.80
± 0.13
|
2.33
± 0.94
|
2.15
± 0.92
|
2.31
± 0.89
|
2.80
± 0.45
|
2.54
± 0.84
|
3.24
± 0.57
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
7.5
± 0.6
|
8.83
± 0.74
|
10.09
± 0.73
|
11.28
± 0.75
|
10.06
± 0.72
|
9.62
± 0.71
|
10.20
± 0.75
|
Table 2: Biochemical Parameters and APTI of Ficus religiosa Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions
|
Parameter
|
Control
(Mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
pH
|
7.20
± 0.12
|
6.97
± 0.15
|
7.05
± 0.10
|
7.10
± 0.12
|
6.64
± 0.08
|
6.60
± 0.10
|
6.55
± 0.09
|
|
Relative
Water Content (%)
|
70.0
± 2.0
|
73.8
± 2.5
|
75.0
± 2.0
|
76.5
± 2.8
|
88.61
± 3.1
|
90.0
± 3.0
|
91.5
± 3.2
|
|
Total
Chlorophyll (mg/g)
|
11.50
± 0.10
|
12.13
± 0.15
|
12.20
± 0.18
|
12.25
± 0.17
|
11.03
± 0.16
|
11.00
± 0.15
|
11.95
± 0.14
|
|
Ascorbic
Acid (mg/g)
|
4.50
± 0.25
|
4.87
± 0.30
|
5.00
± 0.28
|
5.10
± 0.35
|
6.57
± 0.40
|
6.50
± 0.38
|
6.45
± 0.42
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
10.50
± 0.45
|
11.61
± 0.50
|
12.00
± 0.55
|
12.50
± 0.60
|
14.51
± 0.70
|
14.00
± 0.65
|
13.80
± 0.68
|
Table 3: Biochemical
Parameters and APTI of Calotropis procera Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions
|
Parameter
|
Control
(Mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
pH
|
6.50
± 0.09
|
6.34
± 0.10
|
6.38
± 0.12
|
6.40
± 0.11
|
6.12
± 0.08
|
6.10
± 0.09
|
6.08
± 0.10
|
|
Relative
Water Content (%)
|
74.0
± 2.0
|
75.8
± 2.5
|
76.5
± 2.3
|
76.2
± 2.4
|
81.3
± 3.0
|
81.8
± 2.8
|
81.0
± 3.1
|
|
Total
Chlorophyll (mg/g)
|
1.70
± 0.10
|
1.63
± 0.10
|
1.62
± 0.11
|
1.64
± 0.09
|
1.23
± 0.07
|
1.22
± 0.08
|
1.25
± 0.07
|
|
Ascorbic
Acid (mg/g)
|
8.00
± 0.30
|
8.57
± 0.30
|
8.60
± 0.32
|
8.55
± 0.31
|
8.92
± 0.35
|
8.95
± 0.36
|
8.90
± 0.34
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
11.0
± 1.2
|
12.3
± 1.5
|
12.0
± 1.4
|
12.5
± 1.6
|
13.78
± 1.8
|
13.50
± 1.9
|
13.0
± 2.0
|
Table 4: Biochemical
Parameters and APTI of Cassia fistula Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions
|
Parameter
|
Control
(mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
pH
|
6.55
± 0.09
|
6.5
± 0.10
|
6.45
± 0.08
|
6.48
± 0.12
|
6.1
± 0.10
|
6.05
± 0.08
|
6.0
± 0.10
|
|
Relative
Water Content (%)
|
72.5
± 2.4
|
71.45
± 2.5
|
70.0
± 2.3
|
72.0
± 2.7
|
69.89
± 2.4
|
69.0
± 2.3
|
68.5
± 2.5
|
|
Total
Chlorophyll (mg/g)
|
4.7
± 0.30
|
4.5
± 0.30
|
4.4
± 0.25
|
4.6
± 0.28
|
3.34
± 0.20
|
3.3
± 0.20
|
3.2
± 0.25
|
|
Ascorbic
Acid (mg/g)
|
2.50
± 0.20
|
2.45
± 0.20
|
2.40
± 0.15
|
2.50
± 0.20
|
3.45
± 0.30
|
3.40
± 0.25
|
3.30
± 0.25
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.1
± 0.60
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.2
± 0.60
|
18.2
± 0.70
|
18.0
± 0.65
|
18.1
± 0.70
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.1
± 0.60
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.2
± 0.60
|
18.2
± 0.70
|
18.0
± 0.65
|
18.1
± 0.70
|
Table 5: Biochemical
Parameters and APTI of Bambusa vulgaris Across Control, Urban, and Industrial Regions
|
Parameter
|
Control
(mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
pH
|
6.95
± 0.09
|
6.90
± 0.10
|
6.88
± 0.12
|
6.91
± 0.11
|
6.10
± 0.09
|
6.08
± 0.10
|
6.12
± 0.08
|
|
Relative
Water Content (%)
|
85.00
± 1.60
|
84.56
± 1.50
|
84.80
± 1.70
|
84.60
± 1.60
|
87.78
± 2.00
|
87.90
± 2.10
|
87.70
± 1.90
|
|
Total
Chlorophyll (mg/g)
|
0.25
± 0.020
|
0.23
± 0.021
|
0.22
± 0.03
|
0.24
± 0.022
|
0.19
± 0.026
|
0.18
± 0.028
|
0.20
± 0.029
|
|
Ascorbic
Acid (mg/g)
|
0.30
± 0.030
|
0.32
± 0.031
|
0.31
± 0.042
|
0.33
± 0.035
|
0.45
± 0.045
|
0.44
± 0.041
|
0.46
± 0.042
|
|
Air
Pollution Tolerance Index
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.54
± 0.56
|
17.14
± 0.61
|
17.24
± 0.76
|
19.2
± 0.78
|
19.0
± 0.45
|
19.1
± 0.67
|
Table 6: Comparative APTI Values of plant species
|
Plant’s
Name
|
Control
(Mean ± SD)
|
Urban
Region 1
|
Urban
Region 2
|
Urban
Region 3
|
Industrial
Region 1
|
Industrial
Region 2
|
Industrial
Region 3
|
|
Mangifera indica
|
7.5
± 0.6
|
8.83
± 0.74
|
10.09
± 0.73
|
11.28
± 0.75
|
10.06
± 0.72
|
9.62
± 0.71
|
10.20
± 0.75
|
|
Ficus religiosa
|
10.50
± 0.45
|
11.61
± 0.50
|
12.00
± 0.55
|
12.50
± 0.60
|
14.51
± 0.70
|
14.00
± 0.65
|
13.80
± 0.68
|
|
Calotropis procera
|
11.0
± 1.2
|
12.3
± 1.5
|
12.0
± 1.4
|
12.5
± 1.6
|
13.78
± 1.8
|
13.50
± 1.9
|
13.0
± 2.0
|
|
Cassia fistula
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.1
± 0.60
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.2
± 0.60
|
18.2
± 0.70
|
18.0
± 0.65
|
18.1
± 0.70
|
|
Bambusa vulgaris
|
17.0
± 0.50
|
17.54
± 0.56
|
17.14
± 0.61
|
17.24
± 0.76
|
19.2
± 0.78
|
19.0
± 0.45
|
19.1
± 0.67
|
In
industrial regions, Cassia fistula continues to demonstrate resilience,
with APTI values remaining steady. Values fluctuate slightly, ranging from 18.0
± 0.65 to 18.1 ± 0.70, demonstrating its adaptability to elevated pollution
levels typical of industrial settings. This consistency highlights the species'
ability to thrive under diverse environmental conditions, making it a viable
option for both urban and industrial plantation initiatives. Given its robust
performance, Cassia fistula holds promise as an effective species for
environmental management and urban greening strategies, particularly in
moderately polluted areas where its tolerance mechanisms can play a crucial
role in mitigating pollution impacts.
Bambusa
vulgaris, commonly
known as bamboo, demonstrates an intriguing progression in its Air Pollution
Tolerance Index (APTI) values across varying environmental settings. Starting
with a baseline value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, Bambusa vulgaris
shows a gradual increase in urban regions, with values rising to 17.54 ± 0.56
in Urban Region 1 and 17.14 ± 0.61 in Urban Region 2 (Table 5). This upward
trend continues at a moderate pace, reaching 17.24 ± 0.76 in Urban Region 3,
indicating a consistent ability to adapt to urban pollution stress. Plant
tolerance to air pollutants and heavy metals involves integrated defence
mechanisms such as antioxidant activity, detoxification, metal sequestration,
and physiological adaptations that help maintain metabolic stability under
environmental stress (Jipsi et al. 2020). In industrial regions, Bambusa
vulgaris exhibits even higher tolerance levels, with its APTI surging to
19.2 ± 0.78 in Industrial Region 1. Despite a slight variability in subsequent
industrial settings, the values remain robust, ranging from 19.0 ± 0.45 to 19.1
± 0.67. This progression highlights Bambusa vulgaris as a resilient
species capable of thriving under intensified pollution conditions, making it a
superb candidate for industrial and urban plantation strategies. Its stable
performance across diverse environments emphasizes its potential role in
environmental management, particularly in regions requiring species with high
adaptability and pollution mitigation capabilities.
Conclusion
Mangifera indica
exhibits a moderate ability to adapt to pollution stress. Starting with an APTI
value of 7.5 ± 0.6 in the control region, it increases to 10.09 ± 0.73 and
11.28 ± 0.75 in urban settings, reflecting its adaptability to moderate
pollution. However, in industrial regions, its performance declines, with
values such as 10.06 ± 0.72 and 9.62 ± 0.71, before stabilizing at 10.20 ±
0.75. This trend indicates limitations in coping with extreme pollution stress,
positioning Mangifera indica as a suitable candidate for urban
environments but less effective for heavily polluted industrial zones.
Ficus religiosa
demonstrates remarkable adaptability across pollution levels. In control
regions, its APTI value begins at 10.50 ± 0.45. Urban settings show a
progressive increase, ranging from 11.61 ± 0.50 to 12.50 ± 0.60, while
industrial regions exhibit the highest values, ranging from 13.80 ± 0.68 to
14.51 ± 0.70. The data highlights the species' robust mechanisms for tolerating
elevated pollution levels, making it a valuable option for plantation efforts
in both urban and industrial areas.
Calotropis procera
exhibits significant pollution adaptability across regions. Starting with an
APTI value of 11.0 ± 1.2 in the control region, its values rise steadily in
urban areas, reaching 12.5 ± 1.6. Industrial regions demonstrate even higher
tolerance, with values peaking at 13.78 ± 1.8 and stabilizing at 13.50 ± 1.9
and 13.0 ± 2.0 in subsequent areas. The consistent performance across polluted
environments underscores Calotropis procera as a prime candidate for
urban and industrial plantation initiatives.
Cassia fistula
shows stable adaptability to pollution stress. Starting with a baseline APTI
value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in control settings, its values gradually increase to 18.2
± 0.70 in urban regions. Industrial regions maintain a steady pattern, with
values fluctuating slightly between 18.0 ± 0.65 and 18.1 ± 0.70. The species'
resilience across diverse environments makes it a reliable option for both
urban and industrial plantation initiatives, particularly in moderately
polluted areas.
Bambusa vulgaris
exhibits exceptional tolerance to pollution across diverse conditions.
Beginning with an APTI value of 17.0 ± 0.50 in the control region, it rises
moderately in urban areas to 17.54 ± 0.56 and 17.24 ± 0.76. Industrial regions
exhibit even higher values, surging to 19.2 ± 0.78 and stabilizing between 19.0
± 0.45 and 19.1 ± 0.67. These findings position Bambusa vulgaris as an
exceptional species for urban and industrial plantation strategies, especially
in regions with intensified pollution stress.
Ficus
religiosa and Bambusa
vulgaris demonstrate exceptional resilience to pollution, making them ideal
choices for industrial areas, while Calotropis procera and Cassia
fistula also exhibit robust adaptability suitable for moderately polluted
zones. Mangifera indica, although limited in handling extreme pollution,
remains a promising candidate for urban plantation efforts. This analysis of
APTI values highlights the importance of selecting species based on their
pollution tolerance to enhance environmental management and plantation
efficiency.
Conflict
of interest Author declares that there is no
conflict of interest.
Funding
information not applicable.
Ethical
approval not applicable.
References
Chauhan, A., Pawar, M., & Joshi, P.C. (2010). Impact
of air and dust pollution on photosynthetic activity of selected plants in
Haridwar, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 160(1-4), 1-4.
Escobedo, F.J., Wagner, J.E., & Nowak, D.J. (2008).
Analyzing the cost-effectiveness of subtropical urban forests in mitigating air
pollution: A case study in Santiago, Chile. Journal of Environmental
Management, 86(1), 148-157.
Hove, L.V., Adema, E.H., & Voragen, A.G.J. (1999).
The impact of air pollution on plant physiology and biochemistry. Environmental
Pollution, 105(3), 393-401.
Jipsi Chandra, Apurva Mishra and S. Keshavkant (2020)
Heavy Metal Pollution and its Impact on Plants. NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni
Association of Biotechnology, 2(2):5-7.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52228/NBW-JAAB.2020-2-2-2
Joshi, P.C., & Swami, A. (2007). Physiological
responses of some tree species under roadside automobile pollution stress
around city of Haridwar, India. Environmentalist, 27, 365-374.
Kaur, S., & Chahal, V. (2018). Assessment of
pollution tolerance index of selected plant species in urban areas.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(6), 345.
Kumari, M., & Agrawal, M. (2014). Air pollution
tolerance index of various plant species in industrial areas. Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, 106, 237-245.
Lalman, D.L., & Singh, J. (1990). Effect of air
pollution on leaf surface of plants. Indian Journal of Environmental Health,
32(4), 377-383.
McPherson, E.G., Nowak, D., & Rowntree, R. (1994).
Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate
Project. General Technical Report NE-186. U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
Prajapati, S.K., & Tripathi, B.D. (2008). Air
pollution tolerance index of some plant species: A tool for selection of
species for urban green belts. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(4),
253-261.
Sharma, P., & Pandey, S. (2019). Air Pollution
Tolerance Index of selected plant species used in urban landscaping. Urban Forestry
& Urban Greening, 38, 72-79.
Singh, S.K., & Rao, D.N. (1983).
Evaluation of plants for their tolerance to air pollution. Proceedings of the
Symposium on Air Pollution Control, 1, 218-224.
Tripathi, A.K., & Gautam, M. (2007). Biochemical
parameters of plants as indicators of air pollution. Journal of Environmental
Biology, 28(1), 127-132.
Wagh, N.D., Shukla, P.V., Tambe, S.B., & Ingle, S.T.
(2006). Biological monitoring of roadside plants exposed to vehicular pollution
in Jalgaon city. Journal of Environmental Biology, 27(2), 419-421.