NewBioWorld A Journal of Alumni Association of Biotechnology (2019) 1(2):13-15
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Isolation and
Identification of Seed Borne Fungi from different Leguminous Seeds
Shriram Kunjam1* and Krishna Sidar1
Department
of Botany, Govt. V.Y.T.PG Autonomous College, Durg (C.G.) 491 001, India.
*Email- shriramkunjam07@gmail.com
ARTICLE
INFORMATION
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
Article history:
Received 16 November 2018
Received in revised form
15 March 2019
|
|
The present
study aims to identifying seed borne fungi associated with different legumes
plants. The seeds of Macrotyloma
uniflorum, Vigna radiata, Vigna mungo, Vigna unguiculata, Arachis hypogea,
Phaseolus vulgaris, Cicer arietinum, and Glycine max were collected from local market of Hudco, Bhilai. Treated
and untreated seeds were used for the screening of seed borne fungi using agar
plate method. The untreated seeds were found to be associated with highest
number of fungi, while treated seed shows least number of fungi. The fungi
isolated from these seeds were Aspergillus
niger, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A.
nidulans, Alternaria alternata, Rhizopus sp.1, Rhizopus sp.2, Penicillium sp., Mucor sp., Fusarim sp., Macrophomina sp. and
Curvularia sp.
|
Keywords:
Seed borne fungi
Leguminous Seeds
|
|
Introduction
Seed is
the principal key for the production of crop and are the prerequisite for
healthy crop and good harvest. There are large number of plant diseases
occurring due to seed borne pathogens which leads to massive crop damage by
affecting growth and productivity of crops (Williams and McDonald 1983; Kubiak
and Korbas 1999; Dawson and Bateman 2001). Pulses are easily available and huge
reservoir of proteins for the mankind. But out of the several factors responsible
for their low production, seed borne diseases are one of the most common
factors (Nine 1986; Pal 1996). There are various reported cases where plant
diseases spread as a result of the transport of infected seeds (Agrawal 1976)
and therefore seeds are considered as prevalent source for transporting pathogens
from one place to another (Agrawal and Sinclair 1996). A pathogen infecting the
seed can cause abortion of the seed, seed rot, necrosis of the seed thereby
reducing its ability to germinate (Khanzada et al. 2002).
Healthy seed is the key for developing a healthy crop and an essential
requirement for the maximum yield (Diaz et al. 1998). Neergard (1977) stated
that, the grain germplasm is damaged chiefly by the activity of fungi than
other microorganism. Of the many types of plant pathogens, seed borne fungi is one
of the most crucial pathogen determining the quality of seed. In a world facing
problem of malnutrition, protein rich leguminous crops are of prime importance.
The legumes are next to cereals as the most important source of food for humans
and animals (Rathod et al. 2012; Ghangaokar and Kshirsagar 2013). The aim of
the present study was to isolate and identify seed borne fungal pathogen which can
affect the seed during storage condition and germination capacity.
Materials and Method
Collection of seed sample
Seed samples from eight leguminous crops namely, Macrotyloma uniflorum, Vigna radiata,
Vigna mungo, Vigna unguiculata, Arachis hypogea, Phaseolus vulgaris, Cicer
arietinum and Glycine max were purchased from local market of Hudco, Bhilai,
India. The collection and testing of samples were done as per the norms of the
International Seed Testing Association (ISTA 1993).
Detection of seed borne fungi
Detection of seed borne fungi from selected legume seeds were carried
out by agar plate method. There were two types of seeds taken- treated and
untreated. The treated seeds are the one sterilized with 0.1% sodium
hypochlorite for 10 minutes. Both types of seeds were then placed on Petriplate containing Potato
dextrose Agar medium (PDA) by using flame sterilized forceps, 5 seeds per
petridish. The inoculated plates were then incubated at 25± 2°C for 8 days under 12 hrs of alternating cycles
of light and darkness. Thereafter, on the subsequent day seeds were examined
under binocular microscope for the presence of fungi. The numbers of fungi
found on the seeds were recorded and percentage of seeds infected and
germination of seeds with different fungi was calculated.
Identification of fungi
The isolated fungi were identified with the help of the keys, monograph
and available literature (Raper and Fennell 1965; Booth 1971; Ellis 1971;
Barnett and Hunter 1972) whereas untreated seeds were used as control.
Fungal species found growing on the surface
of seeds, type and frequency of occurrence of identified fungal species was
recorded. Percentage Frequency (PF) of occurrence of fungal was calculated by
using the following formula:
PF = (Number of seeds on which fungus
appear / Total number of seeds) X 100
Percentage of Germination (PG) of seeds
varieties are determined as proportion of germinated seeds over the total
number of seeds and computed by using the following formula:
PG = (Number of seeds germinated / Total
number of seeds used for germination) X 100
Results and Discussion
In the present study, total 12 fungal
species viz. Aspergillus niger, A.
flavus, A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, Alternaria alternata, Rhizopus
sp. 1, Rhizopus sp. 2, Penicillium sp., Mucor sp., Fusarium sp., Macrophomina sp. and Curvularia sp. were isolated from eight
leguminous seeds. Percentage frequency of occurrence of fungi of both treated
and untreated seeds shows 100% of occurrence because in all seeds fungal growth
occurs. Percentage of germination shows the proportion of seed germinated over
the total number of seed taken into consideration of both treated and untreated
seed. Treated seed shows high percentage of germination and was perhaps due to
surface sterilization with HgCl2 solution which kills most of the
pathogenic fungi (Table 1 and 2).
Table 1: Percentage of germination of untreated seed.
|
SN Untreated seed A B PG
|
1 Arachis
hypogea 2 5 40%
|
2 Glycine
max 1 5 20%
|
3 Phaseolus
vulgaris 2 5 40%
|
4 Vigna
mungo 1 5 20%
|
5 Vigna
radiata 2 5 60%
|
6 Vigna
unguiculata 2 5 40%
|
7 Cicer
arietinum 5 5 100%
|
8 Macrotyloma
uniflorum 2
5 40%
|
A = number of seeds germinated, B = number of seed taken into
consideration, PG = percentage of germination
Table 2 Percentage of germination of treated seed.
|
SN Treated
seed A B PG
|
1 Arachis hypogea 4 5 80%
|
2 Glycine max
5 5 100%
|
3 Phaseolus vulgaris 4 5 80%
|
4 Vigna mungo
3 5 60%
|
5 Vigna radiata
3 5 60%
|
6 Vigna unguiculata 4 5 80%
|
7 Cicer arietinum 5 5 100%
|
8 Macrotyloma uniflorum 4 5 80%
|
A = number of seeds germinated, B = number of seed taken into
consideration, PG = percentage of germination
The fungal infection of the stored seeds
was the main cause of drop of seed quality during storage. Surface
sterilization minimizes the fungal growth on the seeds (Bhutta 1988). Whereas,
the untreated seeds were associated with high number of seed borne fungi. Seed
surface sterilization with mercuric chloride usually suppresses the growth of
saprophytic and other specific growing fungi (Ramakrishna et al. 1991). It was also observed that surface
sterilization of seed with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite significantly decreased Alternaria alternata and Fusarium sp. amongst the species Aspergillus, A. flavus was the most dominant. Fungi such as species of Aspergillus sp., Curvularia sp. occur in higher percentages on untreated seeds
compared to those of the treated seeds, because they were removed by surface
sterilization. The dominant fungi and fungal growth depend on period of storage
and environmental condition. In this study significant numbers of fungi were
isolated from these seeds. It was found that Vigna unguiculata seeds yielded the highest number of fungal
species while Cicer arietinum and Glycine max both shows the least number
of fungi. In the current study, the order of highest to lowest yielding of
fungal species in selected seed was Vigna
unguiculata > Vigna mungo > Arachis hypogeal = Vigna radiate = Macrotyloma
uniflorum > Phaseolus vulgaris > Glycine max = Cicer arietinum. The
results of present investigation in terms of seed borne fungus of leguminous
plants showed resemblance of result with various research papers taken into
consideration, who reported same fungi on leguminous seed (Abdulwehab et al.
2015, Hussain et al. 2009). Seed borne myco-flora
is the most important component determining the quality and longevity of
seeds. Microbial invasions can lead to
the rotting and loss of seed viability, vigour, germination and oil quality (Nagaraja
and Krishnappa 2009; Saxena et al. 2015).
Conclusion
Based on the present study it is evident
that seeds of selected leguminous crop plants are infected with various fungi.
Among all the seeds Aspergillus niger
is most dominant fungi. This fungus implies an irreversible degenerative change
in the quality of seed, and germination capacity.
Acknowledgement
We express our gratitude towards Department of Botany for providing
necessary resources during the work.
Conflict of interest
Authors had no conflict of interest
References
Abdulwehab SA, El-Nagerabi SAF, El-Shafie AE (2015) Leguminicolous fungi
associated with some seed of Sudanese legumes.
Biodiversitas, 16(2):269-280.
Agrawal PK (1976) Identification of suitable seed
storage places in
India on the
basis of temperature
and relative humidity condition.
Seed Research, 4(1):6-11.
Agarwal VK, Sinclair JB (1996) Principles of Pathology. 2nd
edition, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, pp 539.
Barnett HL, Hunter BB (1972) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi:
Burgess. Pub. Co., Minnesota.
Bhutta AR (1988) Comparison of cotton seed health testing method and
their economics. Pakistan Cotton, 32: 146-153.
Booth C (1971) The genus Fusarium. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.
Dawson WAM, Bateman GL (2001) Fungal communities on roots of wheat and
barley and effects of seed treatments containing fluquinconazole applied to
control take-all. Plant Pathology, 50:575-582.
Diaz C, Hossain M, Bose ML, Mercea S, Mew TW (1998) Seed quality and
effect on rice yield: findings from farmer participatory experiment in Central
Luzon, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Crop Science
23(2):111-119.
Ellis MB (1971) Dematiaceous hyphomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew pp
608
Ghangaokar NM, Kshirsagar AD (2013) Study of seed borne fungi of
different legumes. Trends in Life Science, 2(1):2319–4731.
Hussain A, Anwar SA, Sahi GM, Abbas Q,
Imran (2009) Seed Borne Fungal
Pathogens Associated with
Pearl Millet (Pennisetum
typhoides) and their
impact on seed
germination. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 21(1):
55-60.
ISTA: International Seed Testing Association (1999) International Rules
for Seed Testing. Seed Science and Technology, 29:1-127.
Khanzada KA, Rajput MA, Shah GS, Lodhi AM, Mehboob F (2002) Effect of seed dressing
fungicides for the control of seed borne mycoflora of wheat. Asian Journal of
Plant Sciences, 1(4):441-444.
Kubiak K, Korbas M (1999) Occurrence of fungal diseases on selected
winter wheat cultivars. Postepy Ochronie Roslin, 39 (2):801-804.
Nagaraja O, Krishnappa M (2009) Seed borne mycoflora of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass,) and its
effect on germination. Indian Phytopathology, 62(4): 513-517.
Neergard P (1973) Detection of seed borne pathogens by culture tests. Seed Science and Technology, 1:217-254.
Nine YL (1986) Opportunities for research on diseases of pulse crops.
Indian Phytopathology, 39(3):333-342.
Pal M (1996). Pulse disease scenario. Indian Phytopathology, 49
(2):129-131.
Ramakrishna N, Lacey J, Smith JE
(1991) Effect of surface sterilization, fumigation and gamma irradiation
on the microflora and germination of barley seeds. International
Journal of Food Microbiology, 13(1):47-54.
Raper KB, Fennell DI (1965) The Genus Aspergillus. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1-686.
Rathod LR, Jadhav MD, Mane SK, Muley SM, Deshmukh PS (2012) Seed borne
mycoflora of legume seeds. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and
Research, 3(1):530-532.
Saxena N, Shiva Rani SK, Deepika M (2015) Biodeterioration of Soybean (Glycine max L.) seeds during storage by
fungi. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences,
4(6):1118-1126.
Williams RJ, McDonald D (1983) Grain molds in the tropics: Problems and
importance. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 21:153-178.